Die größte Schwäche der OWS -Bewegung ist der Mangel an klaren Forderungen, programmatischen Debatten, mehr BAUCH als HIRN. Hier ist der ideale Nährboden für MOVE ON, AVAAZ, DEMORACY NOW und anderen sogenannten NGOs, die an der langen Leine der WallStreet selbst liegen und nach dem coveredmotto handeln: Bevor andere die WallStreet besetzen, machen wir es selbst.! Unter dem Titel :“move on“ tries to occupy „Occupy Wall Street“ hatte ich eine Recherche begonnen, die davor warnt, dass eventuell der Groß-Kampftag 15.Okt bereits von AVAAZ-Vätern oder Geschwistern aufgeblasen wurde. ..zusammen mit „democracy now“, von dem die deutschen 15/10er das „Demokratie jetzt“ fast direkt übernommen haben – (die „democracy-now!“-Nahost-Korrespondentin macht beispielsweise gute Vorarbeit für eine Flugverbotszone Syrien und zur Kritik an der US.-NATO-Bombardierung Libyens kommt da auch nicht viel oder nix. Das ähnelt der avaaz-Unterschriftensammlung für die Flugverbotszone Libyen doch sehr stark..)
Meine Recherchen zu AVAAZ usw.. sind nur weiter möglich, wenn mir einige Leute in der LINKEn nicht finanziell den Gar aus machen: Mark Seibert zum Beispiel mit seinen Abmahnverfahren:
Konto Nr. 1140086 VR-Bank Main-Kinzig-Büdingen BLZ 506 616 39 unter dem Stichwort “MARK&PEIN”, um dieses Projekt weiterführen zu können.
Die Juristen am BerlinerLandgericht scheinen meine Seiten zu lesen. Sie bemessen das am 8.Mai (den Tag ber Befreiung) zugestellte Urteil über Ordnungsgeld rund 100 € höher als die bisher eingegangenen Spenden. dazu kommen noch die Verfahrens und Anwaltskosten….. und die nächste Prozessstufe….Der Seibertsche Anwalt nimmt auch in einem Schreiben auf die gegen MARK&PEIN-Spendenaktion Bezug und hofft wohl, sich jetzt indirekt auch mit den Spenden alimentieren lassen zu können. Ich gebe nicht auf und gehe in die Revision !!! Die Zerstörung der Linken sollte auch nicht via bürgerlichem Recht Erfolge erzielen….
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
The grassroots of this movement constitutes a response to the „Wall Street agenda“ of financial fraud and manipulation which has served to trigger unemployment and poverty across the land.
Does this movement constitute in its present form an instrument of meaningful reform and social change in America?
What is the organizational structure of the movement? Who are its main architects?
Has the movement or segments within this movement been co-opted?
This is an important question, which must be addressed by those who are part of the Occupy Wall Street Movement as well as those who, across America, support real democracy.
Introduction
Historically, progressive social movements have been infiltrated, their leaders co-opted and manipulated, through the corporate funding of non-governmental organizations, trade unions and political parties. The ultimate purpose of „funding dissent“ is to prevent the protest movement from challenging the legitimacy of the Wall Street elites:
„In a bitter irony, part of the fraudulent financial gains on Wall Street in recent years have been recycled to the elites‘ tax exempt foundations and charities. These windfall financial gains have not only been used to buy out politicians, they have also been channelled to NGOs, research institutes, community centres, church groups, environmentalists, alternative media, human rights groups, etc.
The inner objective is to „manufacture dissent“ and establish the boundaries of a „politically correct“ opposition. In turn, many NGOs are infiltrated by informants often acting on behalf of western intelligence agencies. Moreover, an increasingly large segment of the progressive alternative news media on the internet has become dependent on funding from corporate foundations and charities.
The objective of the corporate elites has been to fragment the people’s movement into a vast „do it yourself“ mosaic.“ (See Michel Chossudovsky, Manufacturing Dissent: the Anti-globalization Movement is Funded by the Corporate Elites, Global Research, September 20, 2010)
„Manufacturing Dissent“
At the same time, „manufactured dissent“ is intent upon promoting political and social divisions (e.g. within and between political parties and social movements). In turn, it encourages the creation of factions within each and every organization.
With regard to the anti-globalization movement, this process of division and fragmentation dates back to early days of the World Social Forum. (See Michel Chossudovsky, Manufacturing Dissent: The Anti-globalization Movement is Funded by the Corporate Elites, Global Research, September 20, 2010)
Most of the progressive organizations of the post-World War II period, including the European „Left“ have, in the course of the last thirty years, been transformed and remoulded. The „Free Market“ system (Neoliberalism) is the consensus of the „Left“. This applies, among others, to the Socialist Party in France, the Labour Party in Britain, the Social Democrats in Germany, not to mention the Green Party in France and Germany.
In the US, bi-partisanship is not the result of the interplay of Congressional party politics. A handful of powerful corporate lobby groups control both the Republicans and the Democrats. The „bi-partisan consensus“ is established by the elites who operate behind the scenes. It is enforced by the main corporate lobby groups, which exert a stranglehold over both major political parties.
In turn, the leaders of the AFL-CIO have also been co-opted by the corporate establishment against the grassroots of the US labor movement.
The leaders of organized labor attend the annual meetings of the Davos World Economic Forum (WEF). They collaborate with the Business Roundtable. But at the same time, the grassroots of the US labor movement has sought to to carry out organizational changes which contribute to democratizing the leadership of individual trade unions.
The elites will promote a „ritual of dissent“ with a high media profile, with the support of network TV, the corporate news as well as the internet.
The economic elites — which control major foundations — also oversee the funding of numerous civil society organizations, which historically have been involved in the protest movement against the established economic and social order. The programs of many NGOs (including those involved in the Occupy Wall Street Movement) rely heavily on funding from private foundations including the Ford, Rockefeller, MacArthur, Tides foundations, among others.
Historically, the anti-globalization movement which emerged in the 1990s has opposed Wall Street and the Texas oil giants controlled by Rockefeller, et al. Yet the foundations and charities of Rockefeller, Ford et al have, over the years, generously funded progressive anti-capitalist networks as well as environmentalists (opposed to Big Oil) with a view to ultimately overseeing and shaping their various activities.
„Colored Revolutions“
In the course of the last decade, „colored revolutions“ have emerged in several countries. The „colored revolutions“ are US intelligence ops which consist in covertly supporting protest movements with a view to triggering „regime change“ under the banner of a pro-democracy movement.
„Colored revolutions“ are supported by the National Endowment for Democracy, the International Republican Institute and Freedom House, among others. The objective of a „colored revolution“ is to foment social unrest and use the protest movement to topple the existing government. The ultimate foreign policy goal is to instate a compliant pro-US government (or „puppet regime“).
From „The Arab Spring“ to „Occupy Wall Street“: The Role of OTPOR
In Egypt’s „Arab Spring“, the main civil society organizations including Kifaya (Enough) and The April 6 Youth Movement were not only supported by US based foundations, they also had the endorsement of the US State Department. (For details see Michel Chossudovsky, The Protest Movement in Egypt: „Dictators“ do not Dictate, They Obey Orders, Global Research, January 29, 2011)
Egyptian dissidents, Fellows of Freedom House in Washington DC (2008)
„In a bitter irony, Washington supported the Mubarak dictatorship, including its atrocities, while also backing and financing its detractors,… Under the auspices of Freedom House, Egyptian dissidents and opponents of Hosni Mubarak (see above) were received in May 2008 by Condoleezza Rice … and White House National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley.“ (See Michel Chossudovsky, The Protest Movement in Egypt: „Dictators“ do not Dictate, They Obey Orders, Global Research, January 29, 2011)
The following year (May 2009), a delegation of Egyptian dissidents was received by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (See below)
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks with „Egyptian activists promoting freedom and democracy“, prior to meetings at the State Department in Washington, DC, May 28, 2009.
The Centre for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS)
Dissidents of Egypt’s April 6 Youth Movement, which, for several years, was in permanent liaison with the US Embassy in Cairo, were trained by Serbia’s Centre for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS), a consulting and training firm specializing in „Revolution“ supported by DH and the NED.
CANVAS was established in 2003 by OTPOR, a CIA supported Serbian organization which played a central role in the downfall of Slobodan Milosevic in the wake of the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia.
Barely two months after the end of the 1999 bombings of Yugoslavia, OTPOR was spearheaded into playing a central role in the installation of a US-NATO sponsored „caretaker“ government in Serbia. These developments also paved the way towards the secession of Montenegro from Yugoslavia, the establishment of the US Bondsteel military base and the eventual formation a Mafia State in Kosovo.
In August 1999, the CIA is reported to have set up a training program for OTPOR in Bulgaria’s capital Sofia:
„In the summer of 1999, the head of the CIA, George Tenet, set up shop in Sofia, Bulgaria to “educate” the Serb opposition. Last August. 28 [2000], the BBC confirmed that a special 10-day class had been given to the Otpor militants, also in Sofia.
The CIA program is a program in successive phases. Early on, they flatter the Serbs‘ patriotism and spirit of independence, acting as if they respect these qualities. But after having sown confusion and broken the unity of the country, the CIA and NATO would go much further.“
(Gerard Mugemangano and Michel Collon, „To be partly controlled by the CIA ? That doesn’t bother me much.“, Interview with two activists of the Otpor student movement, International Action Center (IAC), To be partly controlled by the CIA ? October 6, 2000. See also „CIA is tutoring Serbian group, Otpor„, The Monitor, Sofia, translated by Blagovesta Doncheva, Emperors Clothes, September 8, 2000 )
„The Revolution Business“
OTPOR’s Centre for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS) describes itself as „an International network of trainers and consultants“ involved in the „Revolution Business“. Funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), it constitutes a consulting outfit, advising and training US sponsored opposition groups in more than 40 countries.
OTPOR played a key role in Egypt.
Egypt Tahir Square: What appeared to be a spontaneous democratization process was a carefully planned intelligence operation. View video below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpXbA6yZY-8
Egypt. The Logo of the April 6 Movement
Egypt’s “April 6 Youth Movement,” the same fist logo, Source Infowars
Both the April 6 Movement and Kifaya (Enough!) received prior training from CANVAS in Belgrade „in the strategies of non-violent revolution“. „According to Stratfor, The tactics used by the April 6 Movement and Kifaya „were straight out of CANVAS’s training curriculum.“ (Quoted in Tina Rosenberg, Revolution U, Foreign Policy, February 16, 2011 )
It is worth noting the similarity of the logos as well as the names involved in CANVAS-OTPOR sponsored „Colored Revolutions“ The April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt used the clenched fist as its logo, Kifaya („Enough!“) has the same name as the Youth Protest movement supported by OTPOR in Georgia which was named Kmara! („Enough!“). Both groups were trained by CANVAS.
Georgia’s Kmara („Enough!“)
CANVAS-OPTOR is currently involved in the Occupy Wall Street Movement (#OWS).
Several key organizations currently involved in The Occupy Wall Street (#OWS) movement played a significant role in „The Arab Spring“. Of significance, „Anonymous„, the social media „hacktivist“ group, was involved in waging cyber-attacks on Egyptian government websites at the height of „The Arab Spring“.(http://anonops.blogspot.com)
Last August, „Anonymous“ waged similar cyber-attacks directed against the Syrian Ministry Defense. These cyber-attacks were waged in support of the Syrian „opposition“ in exile, which is largely integrated by Islamists. (See Syrian Ministry Of Defense Website Hacked By ‚Anonymous‘, Huffington Post, August 8, 2011).
The actions of „Anonymous“ in Syria are consistent with the framework of the „Colored Revolutions“. They seek to demonize the Syrian regime and create political instability. (For analysis on Syria’s Opposition, see Michel Chossudovsky, SYRIA: Who is Behind The Protest Movement? Fabricating a Pretext for a US-NATO „Humanitarian Intervention“ Global Research, May 3, 2011)
Both CANVAS and Anonymous are now actively involved in the Occupy Wall Street Movement.
The precise role of CANVAS in the Occupy Wall Street Movement remains to be assessed.
Ivan Marovic, a leader of CANVAS recently addressed the Occupy Wall Street protest movement in New York City. Listen carefully to his speech. (Bear in mind that his organization CANVAS is supported by NED).
Click link below to listen to Ivan Marovic’s address to Occupy Wall Street in New York City
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkM3BBtc7N0
Marovic acknowledged in an earlier statement that there is nothing spontaneous in the planning of a „revolutionary event“:
„It looks like people just went into the street. But it’s the result of months or years of preparation. It is very boring until you reach a certain point, where you can organize mass demonstrations or strikes. If it is carefully planned, by the time they start, everything is over in a matter of weeks.“ (Quoted in Tina Rosenberg, Revolution U, Foreign Policy, February 16, 2011)
This statement by OTPOR’s spokesperson Ivan Marovic would suggest that the protest movements in the Arab World did not spread spontaneously from one country to another, as portrayed by the Western media. The national protest movements were planned well in advance. The chronology and sequencing of these national protest movements were also planned.
Similarly, Maravic’s statement also suggests that The Occupy Wall Street movement was also the object of careful advanced planning by a number of key organizations on tactics and strategy.
It is worth noting that one of OTPOR’s tactics is „not try to avoid arrests“, but rather to „provoke them and use them to the movement’s advantage.“ as a PR strategy. (Ibid)
Occupy Wall Street Clenched Fist on http://occupywallst.org
PART II of this article will examine the mainstay of the Occupy Wall Street movement, including the role of NGO organizers.
Occupy Wall Street: Who Wants to Hijack the Movement?
Infowars.com
October 8, 2011Media spokesmen for the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations claimed that their operation is totally transparent, with everything subject to democratic discussion in a general assembly of all comers. But eyewitness reports from experienced observers on the ground in lower Manhattan indicate a much different reality behind these bland assurances. Forces appeared to be at work behind the scenes to manipulate the protest movement into a posture of supporting the presidential candidacy of Wall Street puppet Obama.
Eyewitness observers suggest that the deliberations of the general assembly are largely a diversion, and that real power is being increasingly concentrated in the hands of about 20 mysterious and anonymous individuals who appear to make up a kind of covert steering committee that pulls the strings on the general assembly, or else goes around it completely. The members of this cadre of mysterious operatives are not as young as the average demonstrator. The secret leadership is made up of people ranging in age from 25 to over 40, with the older ones occupying the key posts. Many of them appear to be active duty or recently retired military.A Covert Steering Committee Behind the Scenes?Attempts to ascertain the names of the behind-the-scenes leaders are met with stonewalling. When pressed to reveal her identity, one female leader gave her name as “Mary MIA.” Another gave his name as “Tony POW.”If the leaders of OWS want to be transparent, let them make public at least the full names of the people who are actually running the show. No one wants to join a movement with anonymous leaders.Observers have noticed that almost all of the likely members of the secret steering committee disappear from view between 4 and 6 p.m. each afternoon, right before the opening of the general assembly, for which they then re-appear. It is assumed that they are attending a closed-door meeting, but the general assembly is not officially informed of this fact.Strange Bedfellows
Two individuals who appear to belong to the higher levels of the pecking order in Zuccotti Park are pictured above. The one on the left calls himself “Brendan.” When newspaper correspondents and other media representatives arrive, he is often the one who handles relations with them. “Brendan” looks old enough to be the father of many of the demonstrators.
The person pictured above on the right is a frequent speaker in the general assembly. He also has a role in relations with the press. According to one protester, he may have connections to the US military, but this has not been confirmed. Is his do-rag or bandana a fashion statement, or something else?
Who are these people? Who appointed them? To whom are they accountable?
Who Invited Michael Moore?
The general assembly is supposed to approve all major decisions. In reality, it appears to be occupied with endless deliberations about trivia while the really big decisions are being made someplace else. A case in point are the invitations which have obviously been extended to a whole series of discredited left liberal figures, many of them deeply implicated in inflicting the Obama presidency and continued Wall Street rule on our nation. Michael Moore, Naomi Klein, Mike Myers, and left-IMF ideologue Joseph Stiglitz have all appeared, and a visit by Noam Chomsky, a devoted supporter of the Bush theory of terrorism, is reportedly in the works. Eyewitnesses have reported that most demonstrators were not happy with the presence of the millionaire Michael Moore, who was using the demonstrations as props for his usual routine of self-promotion. But these objections carried no weight. Regular participants in the general assembly report that they were never consulted about whether to invite these left liberals. It is therefore a good guess that the invitations were actually issued by the secret steering committee. The general idea is once again to reduce the protest movement to a mere auxiliary in the effort to get Obama reelected.
The Consensus Straitjacket
The members of the secret steering committee have taken a leading role in imposing the unwieldy and time-consuming formalism of always reaching a consensus in the general assembly, meaning that any significant opposition can block the implementation of urgent actions. A simple up or down majority vote is not enough. (The last governing assembly of any major nation to give each member a veto over the actions of the whole body was the aristocratic Polish Diet of the 18th century, which was so dysfunctional that it led to Poland being obliterated from the map of Europe – not an example to be imitated.)
The consensus method provides immense comfort to the predatory speculators of Wall Street, since it virtually guarantees that no potent and controversial strategy to break the power of finance capital can emerge. Indeed, it guarantees that absolutely nothing will be able to emerge in an emergency after a rapid turn in the overall situation. The US Congress is paralyzed by a minority, but the consensus rules of the general assembly mean that it can be paralyzed by a tiny clique bent on sabotage. In the background, the covert steering committee is busy creating a series of faits accomplis.
The deliberations of the general assembly are one big filibuster. On October 4, much of the session was taken up with an agonized discussion of whether to buy or knit and sew sleeping bags as the nights became colder. Right-wing commentators hostile to the protests had a field day using this grotesque scene to mock the entire movement.
Those who run the General assembly sessions are known as facilitators. The relation of these facilitators to the secret steering committee is being investigated.
The OWS Declaration: Not One Concrete Demand for Americans
While the General assembly is occupied with questions like what to order for lunch as part of the shipments of free food that mysteriously appear at the demonstration site, the vital issue of program is left to a subcommittee. On October 5, the Olbermann evening news featured a reading of the Occupy Wall Street Declaration, written by protesters Ryan Hoffman and Lex Rendon. This document does not offer an analysis of the current economic crisis. Rather, it represents a laundry list of complaints, many valid and some spurious. Most important, this document contains not one concrete demand, measure, or program point on which the protesters are willing to pledge that they will be fighting for the interests of the American people. In that sense, it is a document of moral and intellectual impotence. It whines and complains, but it will do nothing to combat the widespread suspicion of the OWS movement felt in many quarters because of the Soros endorsement.
- A D V E R T I S E M E N T
Economic demands are absolutely vital. The movement needs to offer specific solutions for the grave abuses and economic tragedies which are plaguing working people. These demands acquire a material power as they gain mass support. To get support from the inner-city ghetto, from the farm belt, from women, from labor, from the elderly, their vital concerns must be directly addressed. These groups absolutely do not need more analysis telling them how bad things are. They already know that. They need to see a social force which is ready to take leadership in accomplishing radical reforms -or else the revolution, as the case may be.
Student Loan Amnesty Now Paid for by 1% Wall Street Sales Tax
One obvious demand which needs to be included is an immediate amnesty or cancellation of all outstanding student loans. The zombie banks which have been bailed out by the United States government can and should eat their part of the $1 trillion which will have to be written off. The loans guaranteed by the government can be offset by new tax income from a 1% Wall Street sales tax on all financial turnover, including stocks, bonds, and derivatives. Estimates of the additional revenue from a Wall Street sales tax of this type start in the hundreds of billions of dollars and go into the trillions. The proceeds could be split between the federal government and the states, for the purposes of maintaining the social safety net and vital public services. Ordinary people pay sales tax, while bankers pay nothing. One bright spot in the demonstrations has been the presence of the nurses’ union, which has been militantly advocating just such a Tobin tax or financial transactions tax. Student loan amnesty now paid for by a 1% Wall St sales tax is a demand which could blow the lid off US politics once and for all.
Economic program is a science. It requires the mastery of many fields. Serious, intelligent people need to put their gifts to work mastering the science of economic program as part of their social responsibility to the American people.
The Indignados of Madrid: Europe’s Biggest Failures
According to reliable reports, the consensus method was imposed via the steering committee preparing for the demonstrations during the summer months. Individuals claiming to be students from Spain and Greece arrived and joined the steering committee, where they advocated the crippling consensus method. They pointed to the general assemblies held by the indignados of Madrid, a movement of youthful protesters concerned about austerity measures, youth unemployment, the excessive power of bankers, and economic injustice. But, even compared with Tunis, Cairo, Athens, and Reykjavík, the Madrid indignados must be judged as the biggest failure of them all, because of their total inability to oust the “socialist” IMF agent Zapatero, the enforcer of genocidal austerity demanded by the banks, or to block any of the austerity cuts. The indignados had no positive impact whatsoever on Spanish politics. Why imitate failure? This is the side of the current protests which Wall Street predator George Soros was happy to endorse this week.
A New International Otpor?
Observers are reminded of Otpor, the organization created by the CIA and the National Endowment for Democracy for the purpose of overthrowing the Serbian strongman Milosevic in 2000. After that color revolution had occurred, the leaders of Otpor turned their experience into an immensely lucrative consultancy under which they were assigned by the CIA and the NED to Ukraine, Georgia, Lebanon, and Egypt to train the operatives that would overthrow national leaders which the US wanted to get rid of. Have indignados veterans opened a new counterinsurgency franchise of this kind?
The “Theoretician”: Anarchist Peter Gelderloos, Fetishist of Consensus
Last night Occupy Wall Street spokesman Matthew Swaye appeared on the Ed Show of MSNBC, and announced that the main theoretician of the consensus straitjacket is anarchist Peter Gelderloos, author of the book Consensus. Swaye praised the “intricate process” of the general assemblies, where votes are expressed by thumbs up or thumbs down. Gelderloos, who is almost unknown in the United States, was arrested in Spain in 2007, and during his trial became a sort of minor celebrity in certain circles there. This may explain why the indignados leaders were indoctrinated with his belief structure. Gelderloos’s system is a Procrustean bed on which not many in their right mind will be willing to lie down.
Television appearances by protesters Kelly Heresy, Tyler Combelic, Ryan Hoffman, Lex Rendon and Swaye in recent days all have one common characteristic – their absolute inability to formulate a single demand or program which would speak to the urgent needs of the broader American public. Instead, many of them used the few precious minutes they had extolling the virtues of the imbecilic consensus model as the basis for some future Utopia. Hard-pressed working people do not have time for these pipe dreams. American working people urgently need help in finding a job, in blocking a foreclosure, in obtaining health care, and in getting out from under the crushing burden of student loans. Who chose these spokespersons?
So far, the current Wall Street protests have offered these embattled Americans virtually nothing but an unfulfilled promissory note.
Sam Seder, a former broadcaster for the failed Air America network and Obama backer, has argued that the movement should never come up with a program of concrete demands. This is the choice that would suit Obama. Unless and until the protest movement tells the American people what it is willing to fight for on their behalf, it risks becoming a mere collection of roustabouts for the Obama reelection campaign.
The stakes are much too high to let this happen. If this movement fails, fascism may be much closer than many people think. It must succeed, and to succeed it immediately requires a series of intelligible goals.
This post first appeared on Webster Tarpley’s website.
LINK: http://www.infowars.com/occupy-wall-street-who-wants-to-hijack-the-…
Wegen meiner schriftstellerischen/journalistsichen Arbeit werde ich andauernd mit Abmahnungen, etc bedroht. Zukünftig werde ich hier nur noch auf die Adressen der kritisierten Artikel/Portale usw. verweisen. Bisher habe ich zur Erleichterung des Verständnisses die kritisierten Artikel möglichst vollständig zitiert oder angehängt. Im Zusammenhang mit der Abwehr einer Boykott-Kampagne gegen die „junge Welt“ musste ich erst kürzlich zunächst über 800 € an Gerichts-, Anwalts- und sonstigen Kosten bezahlen. Jetzt noch einmal 600 € „Schmerzensgeld“ an den Boykott-Mit-Organisator und Mitarbeiter des Schatzmeisters der LINKEn -Mark Seibert.
Das allein ist erheblich mehr als meine Monatsrente.
Meine Rente/Pension ist berufsverbotsbedingt so gering, dass ich diese Kosten nicht mehr tragen kann. Aber aufgeben will und kann ich angesichts der kriegerischen Entwicklung im Inneren und Äußeren nicht.
Wer mich bei meiner Arbeit und der Kostenbewältigung unterstützen will, kann das unter dem Kennwort „EUROS für MARX“ statt für Mark S. gerne tun: (wer lieber das Kennwort „Nicht Am End“ nimmt in Gedanken an den Nachruf für meinen Freund Günter Amendt, der soll es tun. http://www.barth-engelbart.de/?p=877 Denn dieser Nachruf hätte mich beinahe einige Tausend € gekostet http://www.barth-engelbart.de/?p=1158)
Bankverbindug: VR-Bank Main-Kinzig-Büdingen e.G BLZ 506 616 39
Kto-Nr.: 1140086 Kontoinhaber : Hartmut Barth-Engelbart
Harald Pflüger hat in seinem Portal einen Artikel geschrieben, der die Geschichte ausführlicher erzählt.
http://haraldpflueger.com/de/blog/deutschland/76743-hartmut-barth-engelbart-ein-blogger-soll-in-die-knie-gehen.html
€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€
Ich bitte auf diesem Wege schon mal um Verbreitung eines Spendenaufrufes für Soli-Spenden auf mein Konto Nr. 1140086 VR-Bank Main-Kinzig-Büdingen BLZ 506 616 39 unter dem Stichwort “MARK&PEIN”
Schon wieder MARK&PEIN: HaBE eine Abmahnung vom LINKEn Bu-Vo-Mitarbeiter Mark Seibert erhalten
Zensur am LINKEn Rand:
juristisches MUNDTÖTEN
gegen Linke
http://www.barth-engelbart.de/?p=2184
…….Wenn man die Schärfe bemerkt, mit der hier das Résistance-Mitglied, Nazi-Opfer, der Buchenwald-befreiend-Überlebende Stéphane Hessel wegen dieses Vergleichs angegriffen wird/wurde, kann man sich in etwa vorstellen, welche Angriffe ich über mich ergehen lassen muss(te), weil ich Gaza mit dem Warschauer Ghetto verglichen HaBE. Besonders nach dem Bombenterror “Gegossenes Blei” 2009. Da machen die Angriffe aus dem LINKEn BAK-Shalom auf mich ihren Sinn, denn dieser Arbeitskreis hatte damals die Fortführung der Bombardierung gefordert. Ich bitte euch/Sie dringend um Unterstützung gegen diese Angriffe:
Er wars natürlich nicht selbst, auch sein Anwalt Kay Füßlein wars nicht direkt, aber irgendwie haben es die beiden hingekriegt, dass das Verfahren an der Guten Quelle, der Stätte des ersten segensreichen Wirkens Mark Seiberts, im Amtsgericht Gelnhausen gelandet ist, das in den 90er Jahren über seine Geschäftspraktiken nicht urteilen musste, weil nach staatsanwaltlichen Empfehlungen niemand Anzeige erstattete. Schon gar nicht die GEW-Lehrer, die für das pädagogisch-soziokulturelle Projekt “Gute Quelle” als Bürgen hafteten.
“Jagen wir den Kaputt-Baal aus seinem goldnen Sessel!”
HaBEs Nachruf
FÜR STÉFANE HESSEL:
Und so wird versucht eine jede Bewegung, welche dem System des Kapitals gefährlich werden könnte, von Anfang an zu unterwandern. Nun ja, nicht von Anfang an, erst wird verschwiegen, dann klein geredet, verunglimpft, relativiert. Das ist sicher nicht neu, nur mit der Zuspitzung der Widersprüche innerhalb der Gesellschaft wird auch dieses schwerer fallen.
Dabei ist die Ausgangsposition nicht besonders günstig, ist es doch in den letzten Jahrzehnten gelungen Menschen ihren eigentlichen Problemen zu entfremden und sie zu Erfüllungsgehilfen gegen ihre eigenen Interessen zu machen. Nun setzt ein langsames Erwachen ein, zwar stimmt es das; „die größte Schwäche der OWS -Bewegung ist der Mangel an klaren Forderungen, programmatischen Debatten, mehr BAUCH als HIRN.“ Nur woher soll das Hirn kommen, wenn über Jahre hinweg der Bauch trainiert wurde?